On 01/10/2019 17:48, Wes Hardaker wrote:
Is there a reason it wasn't published through the RSSAC process?
I would personally say that the contents of the document was very technically tied to the *implementation* of the RSS at the various root server operators, and how the current operator deployment architectures address the perceived threats. This is very different (and subtly the same, yes) as the remit of RSSAC which is at the policy level, how should it perform as a whole, what are the requirements of the larger system, what does the community need of the RSS, etc type of questioning.
I agree with Joe that this document is helpful and interesting, but also that I would have comments or questions were it being developed in an RSSAC process. Thanks Wes for your take on this. Would there be a need or an interest in taking what is in this document into discussions at the policy level? -Mallory -- Mallory Knodel Head of Digital :: article19.org gpg fingerprint :: E3EB 63E0 65A3 B240 BCD9 B071 0C32 A271 BD3C C780