Hi I really enjoyed reading the document. I am not young but unfortunately I wasn't yet there to have much of feedback. In all the initial tables 1-2 the software was included, later in 3 there isn't any mention. I wonder if this is because there isn't information or if it wasn't consider relevant anymore. Before moving to Section 3 it would be good to have a simple table summarizing the 13 root servers (you have the table at the Appendix but I think it would be interesting to have it at the end of the section as a nice conclusion. I know that you provide the statements verbatim from the operators, but there are some that do not read as well as the rest of the document. Could you ask some of the operators to rewrite a little some of the statements or provide them with some editorial suggestions? The ones that I really like and could be used as an example are B, F, I and M. The ones that I suggest some rewrite are A (J it is much better and less commercial. A it is like a PR statement ...) For others I will suggest to make it more about the node history, why it was important to deploy and not so much about the people (which are important but not central to the document). Regards as On Wed, 3 Feb 2016 at 14:00 Tripti Sinha <tsinha@umd.edu> wrote:
Dear Caucus,
In September 2015, the RSSAC held its first workshop to discuss issues related to the evolution of the root server system. The public report of the successful workshop is available on the RSSAC publications page <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rssac-publications-2014-05-12-en>.
To prepare for the workshop, the RSSAC compiled a document outlining the history of the root server system. This document provided a foundation for informed discussions at the workshop. The RSSAC has further reviewed the document since the workshop. Before publication, the RSSAC would like to seek input from the Caucus on this document.
The RSSAC would like to propose a process for Caucus review of the draft history of the root server system document. Through *04 March 2016*, the RSSAC invites Caucus members to review the draft for factual correctness. At the end of the 4 week review period, the RSSAC will determine if further Caucus review is necessary before proceeding with publication. Please send your input directly to *Steve Sheng at steve.sheng@icann.org <steve.sheng@icann.org>.*
The RSSAC hopes robust Caucus review will strengthen this important document on the history of the root server system. Please do not hesitate to contact us with any question or concerns. We look forward to your contributions.
Best regards,
Tripti Sinha and Brad Verd RSSAC Co-Chairs _______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus