On Sep 12, 2019, at 8:01 AM, Andrew McConachie <andrew.mcconachie@icann.org> wrote:
Dear RSSAC Caucus,
Thanks to everyone who contributed to the discussions around updating RSSAC002. Based on this feedback the RSSAC Admin Committee suggests the following list of topics to be covered in the update.
Draft Topics List: A) Agree to new terminology around 'latency' B) Discuss removing root zone size measurements C) Discuss adding metric to measure number of resource records changed between zone updates D) Discuss adding metric to measure QNAME minimization
Andrew, My apologies for not participating in the earlier discussion (happened when I was out on PTO). To me (B) and (C) seem at odds. From reviewing that earlier discussion I don't think there was really a lot of support for removing the zone-size metric? It was more a matter of having metrics related to the zone content being reported by the RZM only. Assuming this is the direction we take, RSSAC002 would probably benefit by placing RSO vs RZM metrics into separate sections. Early last year Jerry from DNS-OARC worked on an RSSAC002v3 implementation and found some areas of ambiguity and other things that could be fixed in the next revision. The thread is here: https://github.com/DNS-OARC/dnscap/issues/152. IMO it would be good to address these if possible. DW