On 11/01/2016, 10:50, "rssac-caucus-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Daniel Karrenberg" <rssac-caucus-bounces@icann.org on behalf of daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
My understanding is that RSSAC002 is to be interpreted from the perspective of (measuring the) server behavior. Imo this is also clear from the document itself even if specific sentences may be regarded as ambiguous.
Thanks for your response Daniel. Measuring the server behavior; does that imply that your interpretation is that only responses that are send by the root-server should be considered? And thus not responses received by the root-server?
Of course clarification is always good.
Indeed. Warmly, Roy
Daniel
On 8.01.16 18:05 , Roy Arends wrote:
Hi,
Section 2.5 reads "The RCODE distribution is a raw count of the RCODE values observed in responses during the reporting period.”
This single sentence is ambiguous, since it is interpreted in two ways. Either it includes responses received, or it doesn’t. That needs to be clarified, otherwise the numbers are meaningless as they can’t be compared.
Section 4.3 has a similar ambiguity. Does “responses-sent” mean sent by the root server, or sent by something else, and observed by the root server.
Warm regards and happy new year!
Roy
_______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
_______________________________________________ rssac-caucus mailing list rssac-caucus@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus