The Local Perspective Work Party core writing team met on Wednesday 16 Feb. We discussed the updates to Peter Devries' user narrative on a recursive operator wanting to understand their perspective of the RSS. The primary measurements were Accuracy, Availability, Latency, and Zone Transfer Quality (availability and accuracy). We decided to remove the” Zone Transfer Quality” description. While this measurement may be useful to a recursive operator, it is not an official service provided by the RSS and should be out of scope for this tool. We discussed whether the tool should do signature validation or not. Both sides of the argument were discussed and we want to get input from the larger group on this subject. The document was cleaned up a bit and initial text for a few sections [“Introduction”, Recommendations”, “Requirements”, and “Conclusions”] were proposed and will be further populated over the next few days. Proposed Agenda for work party meeting on 22 Feb: Overview of latest changes to document Discussion of whether tool should perform DNSSEC validation or save signature records for later validation Review new sections of document The document is at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/11slZDTqrcwTwywpbi3JwHuU_FoaoN54u0f3B2UFj... Please feel free to provide comments as suggestions in the Google Document or via the rssac-caucus mail list Ken Renard S&TCD Contractor – ICF Sustaining Base Network Assurance Branch C5ISR Center, Space and Terrestrial Communications Directorate Office: 443-395-7809 kenneth.d.renard.ctr@mail.mil