Hi Susan, and all, I apologise if this was discussed in last week's teleconference, which I unfortunately missed, but is this something that is only intended to apply to the data accuracy recommendations, or more broadly to all of our recommendations? Following from that, how does this fit with the earlier discussion about the timeframes mentioned under the AoC? I certainly support the idea of having clearly defined timeframes and so on, and am just trying to understand how this could fit into the broader picture. Cheers, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2012 1:57 AM To: rt4-whois@icann.org Subject: [Rt4-whois] Recommendation 5 Please see a proposed revision to recommendation 5 highlighted in yellow. I would like to add the following language to rec 5 as a I fear that ICANN will not act timely on the issues. If we give them the responsibility to provide a clearly defined path forward with each of the recommendations with an imposed timeline to the community we may have a better outcome with these recommendations. ICANN should provide a detailed and comprehensive plan within 3 months after the submission of the Final Whois Review Team report that outlines how ICANN will move forward in implementing these recommendations. ICANN should also provide at least annual status reports on its progress towards achieving the goals set out by this WHOIS Review Team, published by the time the next WHOIS Review Team starts.This report should include tangible, reliable figures needed. Susan Kawaguchi Domain Name Manager Facebook Legal Dept. Phone - 650 485-6064 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. This message has been content scanned by the Axway MailGate. MailGate uses policy enforcement to scan for known viruses, spam, undesirable content and malicious code. For more information on Axway products please visit www.axway.com. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------