This is one person's opinion. I happen to like John's writing style but hasten to point out that hyperbole is part of the attraction. On Feb 16, 2012, at 6:43 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote: "I think the criticisms the report makes are devastating. They amount to a more or less complete indictment of ICANN's recent leadership and its current methods of decision-making, by which I really mean non-decision-making." ==> Following up, did we really mean to sound like we were making a "complete indictment" of ICANN's leadership?: I hope not. It seems to me that sound be corrected as well. K: "Out of a current total of 220 million domain names only 23% are fully accurate. 50 million are OK. 170 million are not. " Our final report needs to do a better job of dispelling this falsehood. J. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Rt4-whois] Huffington Post article From: Emily Taylor <emily@emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily@emilytaylor.eu>> Date: Thu, February 16, 2012 5:40 am To: rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org> http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/john-carr/whois-reading-the-whois-r_b_127273... -- [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily@emilytaylor.eu> www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713. ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois