Dear Tema Members, whiole waiting for my flight back home to Europe on Friday, I had the opportunity to consciously read the various documents, already having the considerations of the F2F meeting in my (almost empty :-) ) head. After doing so, I am wondering what the position of the team is wer the recommendations of the SSAC, specifically to think about adopting their proposals for terminology. I think adopting the basic suggestions to clearly specify registration data, protocol stuff and directory service/display for the end-user does make a lot of sense. I am less convinced that the more detailed and specific terminology suggestions and acronyms would really benefit the readers of our final report. Does anyone have a particular pov or guidance? Cheers, Wilfried.