Thanks for the draft describing the Scope of Work! Looking at the AoC this is pretty much on the mark and should be, or rather has to be, our primary goal. At the same time I feel some "artificial restriction" in explicitely mentioning law enforcement and consumer trust, but ignoring all other parties that (may) have a legitimate interest in the working, and the accessibility of whois data. The most prominent example that springs to my mind is the community of operational security and incident teams. I'd like to suggest that we discuss the merits of including such aspects in the Scope of Work, as an aditional activity. On a more genral note, I think we should also "reserve the right" to come up with findings or recommendations that, if implemented, could be beneficial for all the stakeholders. Thanks for your input, Wilfried.