Thank you for your response, Emily. Could you clarify something for me ... in Cartagena I was told that the Team really wanted to hear from Strickling and Beckstrom together. Since Strckling has now been scheduled separately (and at a time Beckstrom currently is not available), am I correct in assuming that the Team has changed it's mind and will only be speaking with Strickling during the London meeting? (which is fine) And that we don't need to try to find another time on Beckstrom's schedule on the 19th or 20th? (and if this is the case, do you have another date in mind?) Thanks for clarifying. Denise Denise Michel denise.michel@icann.org On Wednesday, January 5, 2011, Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> wrote:
Dear Denise, Dear All Denise, I am delighted to here that you and other members of the ICANN team will be in attendance at the London meeting, and appreciate your continued support of the Team's work. All, I attach an updated draft of the London agenda for your information. It is more or less the same as that circulated before Christmas, but makes a number of changes in response to comments: - Later finish time on second day- Inclusion of "producers" under item 3 (Developing the Definitions)- Discussion with Larry Strickling is inserted as new item 4 (afternoon of first day). This item is referred to in Denise's mail, and is carried over from the Cartagena meeting. Denise, if Rod is available to join this discussion, he would be most welcome. If not, we can schedule for another occasion. Your other question, Denise, is I hope answered by the agenda on day 2 (item 6(a)). If anything is unclear, Kathy or I will be happy to give you a briefing. I look forward to receiving any final comments by the end of Friday. In the absence of any comments, we will take this agenda as agreed prior to the meeting. Kind regards Emily