Dear Lynn, Thanks. Just another thought that the spread of consumers intended in 3.1 should also be reflected in 3.2. What I am trying to say is that, for example, we do not want the survey to come back from only those who have never used the whois service as that may bias the data. This factor is not controlled in 3.2 yet. So we may be add following language in 3.2: The consumer spread discussed in 3.1 should be adequately covered in the survey conducted. regards, Sarmad On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:
Dear All, Attached is a copy of the final draft of the RFP for Consumer Trust research. I am ready to release this on Friday so want to give everyone on the team an opportunity for a quick review before our conference call tomorrow.
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this, particularly Sarmad and Kim. We also received some valuable suggestions from Denise Michel and Liz Gasster.
The companies we have identified so far for the RFP include (in alphabetical order):
BCG Comscore Consumer Insights Practice Iconoculture, Inc. IDC OTX SIS International Research User Insight
We have set up an email address for responses that will be directed to a list including Olaf Nordling, Sarmad, Kim, Emily and me. Please speak up if you would like to be added to that list.
Kind regards, Lynn Goodendorf
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois