I always stand for shorter 'main body' and informative appendices. Support Lynn: however, at least some words on WHOIS system should be in the main text. Rgds, M. From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:15 PM To: lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com Cc: Kathy Kleiman; rt4-whois@icann.org; Emily Taylor Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] DNS and WHOIS - How it Works Hi Lynn Interesting suggestion. Any others share this view? Best, Emily On 29 November 2011 20:05, <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com<mailto:lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com>> wrote: Suggestion: Change from Chapter to Appendix After reading through the Draft Report, it seems to me that the section on "DNS and WHOIS- How it Works" should be an Appendix rather than in the main body of the report. While it is useful to have as reference for the reader, it somewhat disrupts the thought flow of the assessment and paper. -Lynn -- [Description: Image removed by sender.] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 * m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu<mailto:emily@emilytaylor.eu> www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk> Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.