I think it should be relatively straightforward using the "Compare documents" function, now that we have the cleaned up final document, and the clean draft as published. Agree it would have been a nightmare to do as we went along! On 17 May 2012 12:57, Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> wrote:

Hi Emily, It sounds like a difficult job for Alice, because we not only edited, but flipped text around. But great thanks to her, if she can do it! Best, Kathy :

Hi all

Thank you for your kind comments over the past few days - much appreciated.

I received a request for a red line version of our final report, and I thought, why not publish one? I found redline versions useful when looking over eg the Applicant Guidebook for new gTLDs in its many iterations. Most people are busy, and if they have already invested time in reading the whole thing, why not just look over the differences?

So, unless you object, I'd like to request that Alice prepare a redline version of the final report, comparing it to the draft report as published.

Please shout if you don't like the idea.

Best,

Emily

--

* *

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu

*www.etlaw.co.uk*

Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.

_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing listRt4-whois@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

--

_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

-- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.

Hi there Just to be clear what I'm proposing, Lynn I don't propose that we publish our working discussions, merely the differences between our two public documents. This is similar to what was done by ICANN for the various versions of the gTLD applicant guidebook. I found it very helpful because if you have read the whole document once, you can then concentrate on what has changed. So, it's just highlighting differences in the two published texts. Kind regards Emily On 17 May 2012 13:16, <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote:

If we have the discretion to decline this request, it seems like unnecessary work to me. The principle that we have emphasized is that this is a consensus based output and we did work hard to achieve that. and we have followed all the transparency practices as we progressed. Lynn

Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

-----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor <emily@emilytaylor.eu> Sender: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:27:09 To: <rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version

_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

-- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.

Can't Word and other programs just do this at a click of a computer key? From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lynn Goodendorf Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:01 AM To: Emily Taylor; lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org; rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version Thanks for the clarification Emily. I still have a reluctance for ICANN staff to spend time on this but feel reassured in that both documents have been published. Lynn Ms. Lynn Goodendorf, CIPP, CISSP VP - Data Privacy Services VerSprite - Navigate Beyond Risk (Main) 1.678.278.8312 | (Direct) 1.404.333.3779 | (Fax) 1.678.222.3401 www.versprite.com <http://www.versprite.com/> |twitter: @VerSprite _____ From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] on behalf of Emily Taylor [emily@emilytaylor.eu] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 8:18 AM To: lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org; rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version Hi there Just to be clear what I'm proposing, Lynn I don't propose that we publish our working discussions, merely the differences between our two public documents. This is similar to what was done by ICANN for the various versions of the gTLD applicant guidebook. I found it very helpful because if you have read the whole document once, you can then concentrate on what has changed. So, it's just highlighting differences in the two published texts. Kind regards Emily On 17 May 2012 13:16, <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com> wrote: If we have the discretion to decline this request, it seems like unnecessary work to me. The principle that we have emphasized is that this is a consensus based output and we did work hard to achieve that. and we have followed all the transparency practices as we progressed. Lynn Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor <emily@emilytaylor.eu> Sender: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 08:27:09 To: <rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Request for redline version _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois -- <http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/etclogo250x60.gif> 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 . m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu www.etlaw.co.uk Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 7630471. VAT No. 114487713.