Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice
14:00 UTC is my preference. On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:48 AM, Alice Jansen wrote: Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice <ATT00001..txt>
Dear Review Team Members, As you know, the time of your last conference call changed as Peter was unable to join. Pursuant to our rotation system and in line with resolutions adopted during your last call, the next session will be scheduled within working hours of Peter's timezone. Since 4:00 UTC was the time initially allotted to the 16 Feb session, our proposal is to adopt this slot for the next call - scheduled for Wednesday, 2 March. This is put forward for your consideration – please feel free to share your views. Should no objection be raised by today, end of your business day, we will proceed with this proposal. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:48:06 -0800 To: "rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>" <rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>> Cc: "Kathage, Tristan" <Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au>> Subject: Next conference call - PROPOSAL Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice
Dear all Please can we move the call to 0500 UTC so that I can join to chair it? Emily Sent from my iPhone On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:41, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Review Team Members,
As you know, the time of your last conference call changed as Peter was unable to join. Pursuant to our rotation system and in line with resolutions adopted during your last call, the next session will be scheduled within working hours of Peter's timezone. Since 4:00 UTC was the time initially allotted to the 16 Feb session, our proposal is to adopt this slot for the next call - scheduled for Wednesday, 2 March. This is put forward for your consideration – please feel free to share your views. Should no objection be raised by today, end of your business day, we will proceed with this proposal.
Many thanks in advance,
Very best regards
Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:48:06 -0800 To: "rt4-whois@icann.org" <rt4-whois@icann.org> Cc: "Kathage, Tristan" <Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au> Subject: Next conference call - PROPOSAL
Dear Review Team Members,
According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences.
Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT.
Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration.
Please advise whether this is acceptable.
Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal.
Thank you,
Very best regards
Alice
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
A one hour change is not going to make a difference to me. So I have no objection. Hopefully others on the team agree. Lynn Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> Sender: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:43:21 To: Alice Jansen<alice.jansen@icann.org> Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS<rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call - _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
No objections here. Omar 2011/2/28 <lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com>:
A one hour change is not going to make a difference to me. So I have no objection. Hopefully others on the team agree. Lynn
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> Sender: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:43:21 To: Alice Jansen<alice.jansen@icann.org> Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS<rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call -
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
I can't make that call if it is an hour later. Or rather I can only participate for 30 min. Kim Please excuse my typos! This is sent from my iPhone. On 2011-02-28, at 12:52, lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com wrote:
A one hour change is not going to make a difference to me. So I have no objection. Hopefully others on the team agree. Lynn
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message----- From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> Sender: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:43:21 To: Alice Jansen<alice.jansen@icann.org> Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS<rt4-whois@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call -
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
I am fine with 0500 UTC From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:43 AM To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call - Dear all Please can we move the call to 0500 UTC so that I can join to chair it? Emily Sent from my iPhone On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:41, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Review Team Members, As you know, the time of your last conference call changed as Peter was unable to join. Pursuant to our rotation system and in line with resolutions adopted during your last call, the next session will be scheduled within working hours of Peter's timezone. Since 4:00 UTC was the time initially allotted to the 16 Feb session, our proposal is to adopt this slot for the next call - scheduled for Wednesday, 2 March. This is put forward for your consideration – please feel free to share your views. Should no objection be raised by today, end of your business day, we will proceed with this proposal. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:48:06 -0800 To: "rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>" <rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>> Cc: "Kathage, Tristan" <Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au>> Subject: Next conference call - PROPOSAL Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
Hi all, I’m fine with 0500 UTC. I look forward to catching up then. I’m not sure if my previous email got through, but if not I’m hoping that someone can help point me to the latest definitions and any other documents (e.g. consultation questions) for law enforcement and applicable laws – this would really help with preparation for the teleconference. I see that there are already definitions of these on the wiki, but I wanted to confirm that these are the proposed finals? Thanks, Peter From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi Sent: Tuesday, 1 March 2011 5:53 AM To: Emily Taylor; Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call - I am fine with 0500 UTC From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:43 AM To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call - Dear all Please can we move the call to 0500 UTC so that I can join to chair it? Emily Sent from my iPhone On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:41, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Review Team Members, As you know, the time of your last conference call changed as Peter was unable to join. Pursuant to our rotation system and in line with resolutions adopted during your last call, the next session will be scheduled within working hours of Peter's timezone. Since 4:00 UTC was the time initially allotted to the 16 Feb session, our proposal is to adopt this slot for the next call - scheduled for Wednesday, 2 March. This is put forward for your consideration – please feel free to share your views. Should no objection be raised by today, end of your business day, we will proceed with this proposal. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:48:06 -0800 To: "rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>" <rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>> Cc: "Kathage, Tristan" <Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au>> Subject: Next conference call - PROPOSAL Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information transmitted is for the use of the intended recipient only and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged material. Any review, re-transmission, disclosure, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the Security Advisor of the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, 38 Sydney Ave, Forrest ACT 2603, telephone (02) 6271-1376 and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this email. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
participants (8)
-
Alice Jansen -
Emily Taylor -
Kim G. von Arx -
lynn＠goodsecurityconsulting.com -
Nettlefold, Peter -
Omar Kaminski -
Smith, Bill -
Susan Kawaguchi