I am fine with 0500 UTC From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 9:43 AM To: Alice Jansen Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Next conference call - Dear all Please can we move the call to 0500 UTC so that I can join to chair it? Emily Sent from my iPhone On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:41, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Review Team Members, As you know, the time of your last conference call changed as Peter was unable to join. Pursuant to our rotation system and in line with resolutions adopted during your last call, the next session will be scheduled within working hours of Peter's timezone. Since 4:00 UTC was the time initially allotted to the 16 Feb session, our proposal is to adopt this slot for the next call - scheduled for Wednesday, 2 March. This is put forward for your consideration – please feel free to share your views. Should no objection be raised by today, end of your business day, we will proceed with this proposal. Many thanks in advance, Very best regards Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 01:48:06 -0800 To: "rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>" <rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>> Cc: "Kathage, Tristan" <Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au<mailto:Tristan.Kathage@dbcde.gov.au>> Subject: Next conference call - PROPOSAL Dear Review Team Members, According to our conference call calendar, the next WHOIS RT session is scheduled for 16 February at 4:00 UTC - https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/TeleConferences. Please note that this time was initially added to the calendar to accommodate Australia in line with our rotation system. As Peter is out of office for the next two weeks, the RT Chair suggested that we should opt for a time that is more convenient for the RT. Since 14:00 UTC used to be the preferred time last autumn for your calls (in line with Doodle poll results), we are putting forward this alternative for your consideration. Please advise whether this is acceptable. Rest assured that we will circulate a doodle poll should concerns or drawbacks be raised in reaction to this proposal. Thank you, Very best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois