Thank you Emily, THis seems a sensible agenda. Could we also discuss where our FTF meeting is going to be held in September please? Sharon Sent from my iPad On 29 Jan 2011, at 09:53, Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> wrote:

Dear all

I'm sure that, like me, you'll be shocked to learn that, next Wednesday, it will be two weeks since our face to face meeting! I'm therefore writing with some suggestions to prepare for our next call.

As we decided at our London meeting, the next conference call is taking place this Wednesday at 16:00 UTC. Bearing in mind our action plan, our priority for this call should be to agree definitions and preliminary questions for public comment prior to the San Francisco meeting. It would be useful to have materials circulated in advance of the call, especially from those groups working on definitions (C, D, E, F).

In preparation for this meeting, we are hoping each subteam will report on:

1. current status, 2. an outline of what they might propose in our public comment period. 3. questions for ICANN staff (questions based on London Compliance and/or Policy presentations, any ICANN materials posted to the Whois Wiki, or as needed), 4. research and support items the Subteam might need,

Alice is ready to help subteams with creating Doodle polls and setting up conference bridges for sub-teams (all calls will be recorded and archived unless otherwise requested).

Early next week, we will also be circulating a short report of our meeting for review, approval and publication by the group.

As a reminder, here are our Subteams:

A. What is the Whois Policy? -- James, Kathy, Wilfried; B. Whois Policy Implementation Review: Peter, Bill, Emily, Michael; C. Law Enforcement: Kim, Sharon, Wilfried and Lutz; D. Consumers and Consumer Trust Sarmad, Olivier, Lynn, Peter, Bill; E. Applicable laws: Kim, Omar, Michael, Lynn; F. Producers and Maintainers of Whois Data: James, Susan, Wilfried (with Omar looking into the related question of who "owns" the data)

Is there anything else we should add to the agenda?

Kind regards

Emily

76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk www.etlaw.co.uk

_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois

Dear All, Here is an interim version of the Working Draft for Consumer and Consumer Trust. This is under discussion in our group and will still change over time. Regards, Sarmad From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 2:54 PM To: RT4 WHOIS Subject: [Rt4-whois] Call on Wednesday - preparation, and suggested agenda items Dear all I'm sure that, like me, you'll be shocked to learn that, next Wednesday, it will be two weeks since our face to face meeting! I'm therefore writing with some suggestions to prepare for our next call. As we decided at our London meeting, the next conference call is taking place this Wednesday at 16:00 UTC. Bearing in mind our action plan, our priority for this call should be to agree definitions and preliminary questions for public comment prior to the San Francisco meeting. It would be useful to have materials circulated in advance of the call, especially from those groups working on definitions (C, D, E, F). In preparation for this meeting, we are hoping each subteam will report on: 1. current status, 2. an outline of what they might propose in our public comment period. 3. questions for ICANN staff (questions based on London Compliance and/or Policy presentations, any ICANN materials posted to the Whois Wiki, or as needed), 4. research and support items the Subteam might need, Alice is ready to help subteams with creating Doodle polls and setting up conference bridges for sub-teams (all calls will be recorded and archived unless otherwise requested). Early next week, we will also be circulating a short report of our meeting for review, approval and publication by the group. As a reminder, here are our Subteams: A. What is the Whois Policy? -- James, Kathy, Wilfried; B. Whois Policy Implementation Review: Peter, Bill, Emily, Michael; C. Law Enforcement: Kim, Sharon, Wilfried and Lutz; D. Consumers and Consumer Trust Sarmad, Olivier, Lynn, Peter, Bill; E. Applicable laws: Kim, Omar, Michael, Lynn; F. Producers and Maintainers of Whois Data: James, Susan, Wilfried (with Omar looking into the related question of who "owns" the data) Is there anything else we should add to the agenda? Kind regards Emily Image removed by sender. Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance) 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 <mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com> www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3409 - Release Date: 01/29/11 00:34:00

Here is an updated version, with Peter's comments incorporated. Regards, Sarmad From: Dr. Sarmad Hussain [mailto:sarmad@cantab.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 9:13 PM To: 'RT4 WHOIS' Cc: 'Emily Taylor'; Smith, Bill; 'lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com'; Nettlefold, Peter; 'Olivier ITEANU' Subject: RE: [Rt4-whois] Call on Wednesday - preparation, and suggested agenda items Dear All, Here is an interim version of the Working Draft for Consumer and Consumer Trust. This is under discussion in our group and will still change over time. Regards, Sarmad From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2011 2:54 PM To: RT4 WHOIS Subject: [Rt4-whois] Call on Wednesday - preparation, and suggested agenda items Dear all I'm sure that, like me, you'll be shocked to learn that, next Wednesday, it will be two weeks since our face to face meeting! I'm therefore writing with some suggestions to prepare for our next call. As we decided at our London meeting, the next conference call is taking place this Wednesday at 16:00 UTC. Bearing in mind our action plan, our priority for this call should be to agree definitions and preliminary questions for public comment prior to the San Francisco meeting. It would be useful to have materials circulated in advance of the call, especially from those groups working on definitions (C, D, E, F). In preparation for this meeting, we are hoping each subteam will report on: 1. current status, 2. an outline of what they might propose in our public comment period. 3. questions for ICANN staff (questions based on London Compliance and/or Policy presentations, any ICANN materials posted to the Whois Wiki, or as needed), 4. research and support items the Subteam might need, Alice is ready to help subteams with creating Doodle polls and setting up conference bridges for sub-teams (all calls will be recorded and archived unless otherwise requested). Early next week, we will also be circulating a short report of our meeting for review, approval and publication by the group. As a reminder, here are our Subteams: A. What is the Whois Policy? -- James, Kathy, Wilfried; B. Whois Policy Implementation Review: Peter, Bill, Emily, Michael; C. Law Enforcement: Kim, Sharon, Wilfried and Lutz; D. Consumers and Consumer Trust Sarmad, Olivier, Lynn, Peter, Bill; E. Applicable laws: Kim, Omar, Michael, Lynn; F. Producers and Maintainers of Whois Data: James, Susan, Wilfried (with Omar looking into the related question of who "owns" the data) Is there anything else we should add to the agenda? Kind regards Emily Image removed by sender. Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance) 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 <mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk <http://www.etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com> www.avg.com Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3409 - Release Date: 01/29/11 00:34:00