Dear Review Team Members, For your convenience, please find enclosed the note pod content of your call held on 9 November. Kindly note that these are draft notes and that Staff will create a preliminary report. Please be kindly reminded that conference call material is posted at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Call+24+-+23+November+2011 Thanks, Kind regards Alice -- Alice Jansen Assistant, Organizational Reviews 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels Belgium Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Reply-To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:36:26 -0800 To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Subject: Adobe Connect - Note Pod Content from WHOIS-Review AGENDA * Roll-call & Apologies * Preliminary reports to adopt: Dakar meeting & 9 November conference call * Review IDN recommendations (Michael & Sarmad) * Sign-off the letter to compliance and discuss sending modalities * Review Emily's suggestions for cuts * Review and discuss James & Susan's proposals on Proxies * Discuss the thread on Thick/Thin or repository of WHOIS * Discuss any comments on the Policy section * Agree/discuss text on the consumer research (Lynn, Seth &Susan) * A.O.B PARTICIPANTS Lynn Goodendorf, Emily Taylor, Michael Yakushev, Sharon Lemon, Seth Reiss, Susan Kawaguchi, Kathy Kleiman, Lutz Donnerhacke, Bill Smith APOLOGIES James Bladel, Omar Kaminski, Olof Nordling NOTES 1. Dakar preliminary report - Adopted 2. Preliminary report 9 Nov - Adopted 3. Letter as appendix to report - no urgency to send the report. Finalize the draft report and letter. (SK) volunteered to provide comments on the letter by next Wednesday - Emily invites Members to submit their final comments. 4. Team thanks Michael and Sarmad. Susan: interest in recommendation 1 - would this fall within the category of PDP? Suggestions from Denise or ICANN Staff on most effective way to have recommendations implementation. Lynn -- for ICANN staff to figure out. Emily: we are addressing the Board - up to them to figure who to task to do what. We need to make sure we review the wording of recommendation. Let's not be specific and let the Board decide. Lynn: recommendations need to be actionnable and implementable. Kathy on recommendation 3: is this a translation requirement we are talking about or an accuracy issue? Accuracy in terms of translation and transcription - local languages. transcribed to ASCII codes without ambiguity. Kathy to work with Michael and Sarmad on legal wording. Bill - recommendation 1 - mechanisms exist. 5. Comments on draft report - AJ to circulate a document containing comments + matching contentious sections of the report. Agree to avoid track changes. Commitment: 30 Nov Sharon to read report (fresh eye), to share with LE colleagues. 6. Agreement needed on these recommendations. Do look like policy but there is some middleground. Lynn: Definition help clarify that - this section very useful in evaluating WHOIS. Consistent with AoC --> services not intended to restrict the access because language does say unrestricted public access.. Susan: go through this document one more time, get on phone with James and Kathy and deliver to group on Monday evening. 7. Should identify problems not make policy. Lutz proposes a central access to repositories - Lutz to take another look at his text to make it more generalized: ICANN nominates suitable provider. Develop language and circulate it. Kathy and James can review. Lynn: this section has linkage with consumer trust section 7. Policy section deferred - to be finished asap 8. Lynn: ntent of AoC is a very broad group of people. If have more limited people (those who something about it), it is not consistent with AoC. Need to bring out potential value of WHOIS to consumer. Awareness program/communication program that promotes WHOIS. Emily: consumers - people close to LE, registrants, trademark - driving the volumes and reliant on it. Lutz: WHOIS does not help if serious organized crime. Lynn: broader education. Lynn: Sanity check. Kathy: Not overconclude from qualitative.. Seth and Lynn to refine draft (redline) and to come back with draft by Monday
Dear Review Team Members, For your convenience, please find enclosed the note pod content of your call held on 23 November. Kindly note that these are draft notes and that Staff will create a preliminary report. Please be kindly reminded that conference call material is posted at: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Call+24+-+23+November+2011 Thanks, Kind regards Alice -- Alice Jansen Assistant, Organizational Reviews 6 Rond Point Schuman, Bt.5 B-1040 Brussels Belgium Direct dial: +32 2 234 78 64 Mobile: +32 4 73 31 76 56 Skype: alice_jansen_icann From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Reply-To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:36:26 -0800 To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Subject: Adobe Connect - Note Pod Content from WHOIS-Review AGENDA * Roll-call & Apologies * Preliminary reports to adopt: Dakar meeting & 9 November conference call * Review IDN recommendations (Michael & Sarmad) * Sign-off the letter to compliance and discuss sending modalities * Review Emily's suggestions for cuts * Review and discuss James & Susan's proposals on Proxies * Discuss the thread on Thick/Thin or repository of WHOIS * Discuss any comments on the Policy section * Agree/discuss text on the consumer research (Lynn, Seth &Susan) * A.O.B PARTICIPANTS Lynn Goodendorf, Emily Taylor, Michael Yakushev, Sharon Lemon, Seth Reiss, Susan Kawaguchi, Kathy Kleiman, Lutz Donnerhacke, Bill Smith APOLOGIES James Bladel, Omar Kaminski, Olof Nordling NOTES 1. Dakar preliminary report - Adopted 2. Preliminary report 9 Nov - Adopted 3. Letter as appendix to report - no urgency to send the report. Finalize the draft report and letter. (SK) volunteered to provide comments on the letter by next Wednesday - Emily invites Members to submit their final comments. 4. Team thanks Michael and Sarmad. Susan: interest in recommendation 1 - would this fall within the category of PDP? Suggestions from Denise or ICANN Staff on most effective way to have recommendations implementation. Lynn -- for ICANN staff to figure out. Emily: we are addressing the Board - up to them to figure who to task to do what. We need to make sure we review the wording of recommendation. Let's not be specific and let the Board decide. Lynn: recommendations need to be actionnable and implementable. Kathy on recommendation 3: is this a translation requirement we are talking about or an accuracy issue? Accuracy in terms of translation and transcription - local languages. transcribed to ASCII codes without ambiguity. Kathy to work with Michael and Sarmad on legal wording. Bill - recommendation 1 - mechanisms exist. 5. Comments on draft report - AJ to circulate a document containing comments + matching contentious sections of the report. Agree to avoid track changes. Commitment: 30 Nov Sharon to read report (fresh eye), to share with LE colleagues. 6. Agreement needed on these recommendations. Do look like policy but there is some middleground. Lynn: Definition help clarify that - this section very useful in evaluating WHOIS. Consistent with AoC --> services not intended to restrict the access because language does say unrestricted public access.. Susan: go through this document one more time, get on phone with James and Kathy and deliver to group on Monday evening. 7. Should identify problems not make policy. Lutz proposes a central access to repositories - Lutz to take another look at his text to make it more generalized: ICANN nominates suitable provider. Develop language and circulate it. Kathy and James can review. Lynn: this section has linkage with consumer trust section 7. Policy section deferred - to be finished asap 8. Lynn: ntent of AoC is a very broad group of people. If have more limited people (those who something about it), it is not consistent with AoC. Need to bring out potential value of WHOIS to consumer. Awareness program/communication program that promotes WHOIS. Emily: consumers - people close to LE, registrants, trademark - driving the volumes and reliant on it. Lutz: WHOIS does not help if serious organized crime. Lynn: broader education. Lynn: Sanity check. Kathy: Not overconclude from qualitative.. Seth and Lynn to refine draft (redline) and to come back with draft by Monday
participants (1)
-
Alice Jansen