Wouldn't it be good to think policy driven application -the application of LGRs within the limits of existing and future policies/ constraints at the start? Kind regards, Dessalegn On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Dr Ajay Data <ajay@data.in> wrote:
I think, our scope is limited to whatever work has happened in LGR`s , we are looking for there "application" . Also there is no "character count" in labels is under discussion as of now for IDN TLD`s.
thanks.
*Dr. Ajay DATA* * | Founder & CEO * Get email id like *अजय@डाटा.भारत* in your own language, visit www.xgenplus.com
------------------------------ *From:* Dessalegn Yehuala <mequanint.yehuala@gmail.com> MailId : [80839687] *To:* "rz-lgr-sg@icann.org" <rz-lgr-sg@icann.org> *Subject: *[RZ-LGR-SG] Some scope issues for deliberation *Date:* 23 Apr 2018 05:52:48 PM
Dear All, I was not able to attend the previous call due to the meeting tool limitation. I would like to bring to the SG`s attention a few scope related issues- as it stands two letters alphabet-based ASCII labels are reserved for ccTLD, will this also be remain the case in IDN?
Is the study group also scoped to address issues related to the use of geo or territory names for U-Label-based TLDs?
Kind regards, Dessalegn _______________________________________________ RZ-LGR-SG mailing list RZ-LGR-SG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rz-lgr-sg
Do not Remove: [HID]20180423175248376[-HID]