The people on the call today were supportive of CHOICE 3 (see below). If you have a different opinion, please speak up now. Russ
On May 13, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
SUBTEAM 1
The comments against recommendation 1 fall into two categories:
1) Strong support for finishing SSR1 recommendation implementation from BC, IPC, M3AAWG, NCSG, RrSG, and RySG.
2) Request for more detail on what is needed to "fully implement" each SSR1 recommendation from SSAC, ICANN Board, ICANN Org, and GAC.
In addition, the following comment assigned to Subteam 1 is not really about Recommendation 1. I think we need to recategorize it.
(SSAC)(3.1.2) The SSAC has some concerns about the viability of implementation of such a significant list of actions. Specifically, the SSAC is concerned about the extent, cost, sequence, and timeframe of the necessary actions required to implement all of these recommendations. Are there other measures that the SSR2 RT may wish to propose that would give the 135 proposed recommendations a significant prospect of avoiding the same incomplete fate as the 27 outstanding SSR1 recommendations by the time of the next SSR review?
This is really encouraging us to have fewer recommendations. The GAG comments also encourage fewer recommendations.
I think the whole review team needs to weigh in on the choices for going forward.
CHOICE 1) Bring the table from Appendix D forward into Recommendation 1 and make each row SMART. (A lot of work).
CHOICE 2) Drop Recommendation 1 and strengthen Suggestion 2 to say that incomplete implementation will be caught earlier in the process by the ICANN community, but also encourage the completion of the SSR1 recommendation implementation.
CHOICE 3) Keep Recommendation 1 as is, and strengthen Suggestion 2.
We will discuss the way forward on the next SSR2 RT Plenary call.
Russ
On May 11, 2020, at 14:02, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
We are not having a plenary call this week so that subteams can continue their work.
I ask that the Rapporteur for each subteam to send a short status to the whole team by close of business on Wednesday.
Thanks, Russ
- - - - - - - -
Subteam No. / Rapporteur
1 Russ 2 Boban 3 Kerry-Ann 4 Noorul 5 Laurin 6 Norm 7 Boban 8 Boban 9 Boban 10 Denise 11 Denise 12 Denise 13 Denise 14 Denise 15 Laurin 16 Laurin 17 Laurin 18 Laurin 19 kc 20 Eric 21 Eric 22 kc 23 Zarko 24 kc 25 kc 26 Zarko 27 Alain 28 Naveed 29 Kerry-Ann 30 Eric 31 Zarko