On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 02:31:10PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote:
Last week, we talked about the information that we need to collect in a table. I put together a template for the table, and asked the vice chairs to review it. Attached is the resulting structure for the table. At this point, I invite the whole review team to review it. Is there anything that we need to capture that this does not capture?
i had wanted to contribute thoughts to last week's conversation but the transcript is not posted yet, i was waiting for that. i'm not sure about this suggestion, but... i'm wondering if we should have a question that covers how hard it is to figure out whether the recommendation was implemented? as i was reading many of the recommendations, and ICANN's custom slide set descibing how "all of them are implemented", i found myself thinking "it should not be this hard to figure out whether they did X appropriately." ideally, and i hope this is an SSR2 recommendation, there should be one public document to cover 'transparency and accountability wrt implementation of recommendations in this report'. so maybe the 4 questions are (first 3 as worded in the doc): (1) Execution (2) Assessment of Efficacy (3) Relevance and Current Needs (4) Transparency and Accountability: How difficult is it for a member of the ICANN community to find out the answers to (1) and (2)? k