I agree that we should drop this one. Russ
On Oct 16, 2019, at 12:19 PM, k claffy <kc@caida.org> wrote:
i came late to the call so i don't know what was said about recommendation 25, but eric and i proposed folding it into all the abuse measurement recommendations that come later (earlier? i can't tell from what's in this google doc).
per denise's suggestion, we should probably air this on the list before we kill it.
Recommendation 25: (Global SSR Measurement) -- Rec 24, 25, 30, 33, 34
ICANN should propose or task the community to create a set of global (holistic) SSR-related measurements (including DNSSEC, availability, integrity, abuse, etc.) measurements that are both knowable and meaningful (i.e. what the community is likely to find informative and is also tractable to measure). This data may (and likely will) involve the cooperation of non-ICANN-org resources. ICANN should propose a set of data that is useful to assess the global health of the DNS globally (including deployment of DNSSEC, availability, abuse, abuse) and post this proposal for public comment. ICANN should then incorporate community feedback and produce a plan to create this public data/repository and an access model for these data. At the moment, it is difficult to assess DNSSEC deployment, including for members of the ICANN community. Better tracking of relevant indicators would serve strategic objectives 1, 2, and 3.
when we do write measurement recommendations, we need to make them much more concrete ("measurement of abuse" won't cut it), and/or delegate them to some independent measurement expert to be contracted by icann, with all the resulting measurement methodology and data required to be public such that the analyses are reproducible.
k