Sept. 11, 2018
1:49 p.m.
clarification: istme we might find it useful to modify the questions after we try to fill out the answers a few times. but it seems perfectly fine to start w these. sooner is better, i assume.. btw ssac recently reviewed all ssac reports since 2010 or so, to see if they needed repeating/revisiting. similar goes but i think russ' questions are structured better. notably, we were each asked to volunteer to take on 1-5 reports to review and provide judgement on. some overlap to get more than one pair of eyes. it took a few tries to convince earnest "volunteers" ;) are we doing this kind of divide-and-conquer? k