Yes, happy to discuss. I've just added a comment in the doc. "My only point is about readers of the report, if the team writes that negotiations where closed they might not understand the process, and the communities' role in then-new RA." I undestand that RA process was more comlicated that "closed negotiations", and that the comminity had a role. D -----Original Message----- From: k claffy <kc@caida.org> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 12:49 AM To: danko.jevtovic@board.icann.org Cc: 'ICANN SSR2' <ssr2-review@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] SSR2 action item: Review rec 29 markup Danko, I have a question on one of your comments. I wonder if we can discuss on the call tomorrow: The new Registry Agreement wasnt part of the PDP, but it was part of the implementation discussion on the Application Guidebook. The community reviewed the draft RA several times. I believe that SSR2-RT recommendation would be more impactful if problem statements are more based on the facts. I'm trying to figure out what is the false statement you believe is in the document. This comment doesn't seem inconsistent with the sentence it's pointing to. k