I disagree with the last paragraph, and think it undermines the entire assessment and the review process. Can you provide specific examples of recommendations that you believe we did a crappy job of assessing? Because that is what the current text implies. If someone is not satisfied with the way these assessments have been done, leadership should ask them to work 2-3 specific examples of what they consider a satisfactory assessment of a recommendation. Leadership could extend the same offer to anyone on ICANN staff as well. But we cannot write a report and then end it with "it would take too long and too many resources to do this accurately, so we didn't." My specific suggestion is to remove the last paragraph of the Limitations section. k