Dear IRT members, I am sending out a reminder to request that you please review the draft PICDRP FAQ document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s2HDjFjSoDhCQK7z9AHdBdIvZrkLPO-C0gik2OvC...> and add any comments prior to our upcoming meeting this Tuesday, 2/10 at 19:00 UTC. We hope to walk through any comments/concerns during the meeting. We thank you for taking the time to review the document and look forward to this discussion. To support your review, we have: * Linked the relevant section of the AGB that addresses this topic (AGB Section 7.8<https://newgtldprogram-2026-agb.icann.org/en/11-module-7-string-and-applicat...>), * Shared a copy of the draft FAQ document<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s2HDjFjSoDhCQK7z9AHdBdIvZrkLPO-C0gik2OvC...> on the community’s external drive for your reference and input, * Attached a PDF copy to this email for those who cannot access the drive, * Noted that FAQs on dispute resolution procedures after delegation are mentioned in Section 1.2.17<https://newgtldprogram-2026-agb.icann.org/en/5-module-1-the-applicant-journe...> of the AGB, and * Noted that Recommendation 33.2 requested “clearer, more detailed, and better-defined guidance on the scope of the procedure, the role of all parties, and the adjudication process must be publicly available”. We are seeking general feedback on: 1. Whether this FAQ, as drafted, implements the level of detail and clarity requested in Recommendation 33.2, and 2. Whether a similar approach could be used when developing FAQs for RRDRP and TM-PDDRP. Please reach out if you have questions. Thank you. Kind Regards, Ilana Licassi