Dear Rubens, Thank you for kindly reaching out. When I checked the Google Doc just now, I could see the fee language. I also saw another external IRT member in the document. Version history seems to suggest the document had been available and not modified since before I sent the email yesterday. So perhaps the issue is at your end. In any case, attached is a PDF version that hopefully works. Kind regards. Lars From: Rubens Kuhl via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Reply-To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Date: Friday, 7 February 2025 at 20:48 To: Michael Karakash via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Subject: [SubPro-IRT] Re: Next Steps + Language on Fees and Application Questions a. On Tuesday<https://community.icann.org/x/CAAvH>, we will focus on Fees [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1StflMJFVTXvgT...> and the RA. You can now review the draft AGB language on fees [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1StflMJFVTXvgT...>, which includes updates based on the feedback we have received to-date, including an additional refund window, refund options for strings that are determined to be of high risk of collision, and refunds in case of material changes to the AGB. Draft AGB Language: Application Fees [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1StflMJFVTXvgT...> It would be nice to have the actual fees before the session. For now they are blank. Rubens