Dear Juan, Many thanks for your feedback! We will discuss it with the IRT next week. Best, Elisa From: Juan Manuel Rojas via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Reply to: Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@yahoo.com> Date: Monday, 18 August 2025 at 11:53 To: Lars Hoffmann via SubPro-IRT <subpro-irt@icann.org> Subject: [SubPro-IRT] "General Public" and Objections Dear all, Regarding the objection process language discussed in our last meeting: The evolution from 'The General Public' to 'Parties with Standing' creates an unintended barrier. While 'standing' is legally precise, it's opaque to the very communities who may need objection procedures most. We are proposing hybrid language that maintains legal requirements while providing clear invitation and explanation: 'The General Public, provided they meet the requirements to file ("standing") [with a footnote to Table 3-1: Overview of the Objection Grounds, Parties with Standing [that we discussed last week]] Best, Juan JUAN MANUEL ROJAS, M.Sc. Director - MINKA DIGITAL Colombia NPOC Chair - NCSG/GNSO M.Sc. Information Technology Registered Linux User No.533108. http://www.jmanurojas.com [jmanurojas.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.jmanurojas.com__;!!PtGJab4!-MKqQTY-4QI...> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GIT d- s: a+ C+++ UL P+ L+++ !E !W+++ !N !o K+++ w-- !O M- V PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP+ t+ 5 X++ R tv+ b+ DI D G e+++(+++)>+++ h+ r++ y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------