The RTL/LTR combo, yes, but not specific to a script. Am I missing something? Richard Merdinger VP, Domains - GoDaddy rmerdinger@godaddy.com<mailto:rmerdinger@godaddy.com> From: Mark Svancarek <marksv@microsoft.com> Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 11:13 AM To: Richard Merdinger <rmerdinger@godaddy.com>, Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com>, Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com>, Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org> Cc: "ua-discuss@icann.org" <ua-discuss@icann.org> Subject: RE: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103 Actually, we recently discovered an Edge bug (via the browser review) where the order of labels in a RTL.RTL.ASCII domain name were transposed during rendering. So I like calling it out explicitly. From: ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Richard Merdinger Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 8:10 AM To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com>; Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com>; 'Don Hollander' <don.hollander@icann.org> Cc: ua-discuss@icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103 I agree; good comment, and I appreciate Hazem taking the time to share it. Richard Merdinger VP, Domains - GoDaddy rmerdinger@godaddy.com<mailto:rmerdinger@godaddy.com> From: <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via UA-discuss" <ua-discuss@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org>> Reply-To: Dennis Tan Tanaka <dtantanaka@verisign.com<mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com>> Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 8:37 AM To: Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com<mailto:hhezzah.las@gmail.com>>, Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org<mailto:don.hollander@icann.org>> Cc: "ua-discuss@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org>" <ua-discuss@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103 This is a fair comment. We probably need to use the LTR and RTL nomenclatures, which is the essence of those test cases. That also makes it generic for all RTL scripts, not only Arabic. -Dennis From: <ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Hazem Hezzah <hhezzah.las@gmail.com<mailto:hhezzah.las@gmail.com>> Organization: LAS Date: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 9:06 AM To: Don Hollander <don.hollander@icann.org<mailto:don.hollander@icann.org>> Cc: "UA-discuss@icann.org<mailto:UA-discuss@icann.org>" <ua-discuss@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103 Hi Don, I was just wondering why is Arabic considered different than Unicode@idn.idn<mailto:Unicode@idn.idn> in EAIs? Arabic characters are Unicode, and Arabic domain names are also IDN. The only difference is the LTR and RTL reading order, which is probably done by the rendering part, but storing and validating is the same. Regards, Hazem Hezzah From: ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Don Hollander Sent: Wednesday, 09 August, 2017 1:54 To: ua-discuss@icann.org<mailto:ua-discuss@icann.org> Subject: [UA-discuss] Programming Language Hacks - UA103 Thanks for the comments on an earlier edition of UA103 – especially from Tex, Jim & Dennis. Please find a second version of the document – with some work still needed in the highlighted sections. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zahm4ZVS9lH9Zx8v-8PRhOnTV7fmEI8tStgLUBCkldA/edit?usp=sharing<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1Zahm4ZVS9lH9Zx8v-8PRhOnTV7fmEI8tStgLUBCkldA%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7Cb1f19af7824e4892ef9a08d4df38be29%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636378882184271357&sdata=qfinZIwTAJjhwy1V1DGEVuJP4OXWjdbhOSMiXRdAEpo%3D&reserved=0> Also attached as a PDF Your comments would be most welcome indeed. Thanks. Don