Ram and UA Members, Have we requested or received any of the underlying data that supports the stats outlined in the BlueCoat report? I wonder why the .zip extension was referenced as a ‘shady’ considering it hasn’t launched yet. Thanks, Jennifer Jennifer Gore Standiford Policy Director Web.com 12808 Gran Bay Parkway, West | Jacksonville, FL 32258 Office: 904. 680-6919| Cell: 904. 401-4347 [cid:image003.png@01CFD6B5.902BADC0] From: ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ua-discuss-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ram Mohan Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 1:43 PM To: UA-discuss@icann.org Subject: [UA-discuss] Blue Coat's Web's Shadiest Neighborhoods and implications on TLD acceptance Folks, BlueCoat<https://www.bluecoat.com/company-overview>, a security vendor used by most of the Fortune 500, released a report on the Web’s shadiest TLDs<https://www.bluecoat.com/company/press-releases/blue-coat-reveals-webs-shadi...> on Sep 1, 2015. They recommend to their 15,000+ customers to block all listed TLDs (report attached). Most of these are new gTLDs. There are implications for universal acceptance. This will result in some discussion at the upcoming UA Coordination Summit in Horsham tomorrow and Friday. The summit will have a conference bridge for anyone interesting in participating. Don Hollander will provide details. -Ram Chair, UASG o: +1.215.706.5700 x103; m: +1.215.431.0958; f: +1.215.706.5701 Skype: gliderpilot30 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Web’s Top 10 "TLDs with Shady Sites*" Rank Top-Level Domain Name Percentage of Shady Sites #1 .zip 100.00% #2 .review 100.00% #3 .country 99.97% #4 .kim 99.74% #5 .cricket 99.57% #6 .science 99.35% #7 .work 98.20% #8 .party 98.07% #9 .gq (Equatorial Guinea) 97.68% #10 .link 96.98%
