I have some tooling that may help with testing unicode behavior/DNS lookups for more unusual cases that may help relating to a project I started at ICANN63. It's still rough alpha stage, but it might help shake look things. Basically, it allows you to setup an entire root zone with any labels you want in docker containers and then check the behavior in the browser. Michael On 11/9/18 7:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
With my Mozilla hat on, yes, bug reports are always welcome. Migrating from IDNA2003 to IDNA2008 is, of course, a big effort...
On 11/9/18 5:21 PM, Mark Svancarek (CELA) via UA-discuss wrote:
Should we file bugs against browsers with these behaviors?
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 4:19 PM To: Mark Svancarek (CELA) <marksv@microsoft.com>; ua-discuss@icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-discuss] Fun with Unicode
Many of these are invalid under 2008. Yet another example where sticking to the old protocol or UTS#46 hurts us.
A
-- Please excuse my clumbsy thums ---------- On November 10, 2018 04:19:35 "Mark Svancarek \(CELA\) via UA-discuss" <ua-discuss@icann.org> wrote:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fshksp r.mobi%2Fblog%2F2018%2F11%2Fdomain-hacks-with-unusual-unicode-characte rs%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cmarksv%40microsoft.com%7C25ef81dd6f7c415d3fb0 08d646a22738%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636774059725 382049&sdata=4tKv6zQWKCHBTTMrwz24D4d90iom%2B%2BRcFrWk00uclew%3D&am p;reserved=0
Actually, the remapping by browsers seems bad