On 4/16/2019 8:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
So, instead, what of defining good mailbox naming practice for just one of the orthography categories? This could serve to illustrate both good practice (Universal Acceptance) and bad practice (Uncritical Acceptance).
Sorry, what do you mean by "orthography categories"? There's plenty of advice about scripts and character classes and confusables that we can build on.
I think this is intended to cover what I would call "modern, everyday general use", or the letters that people learn in school, as opposed to arcane, outdated, specialized code points for the same languages and scripts that are also in Unicode for use by scholars and other specialized and expert users. The proposal is apparently to pick an example for didactic purposes. A./