I couldn't resist. I took a look at the site. The domain name and the surface content are infuriating. They create a frame with the idea that a regex for email addresses is possible and desirable. However, at the bottom of the page is a discussion thread. It says exactly what I would hope a discussion about "email regex" would say. It is dominated by objections to using regex's for anything more than the most simple syntax checking. Many people make the point that the only way to know if an email address is valid is to send a test message to it. And, if you look at the regex examples in the different programming languages, they do different things. That says to me, as a software developer, that this is not a serious site. If the site had a really good regex, they would try to preserve its merits in all the programming languages. So, I think this site is infuriating, but not worth spending much effort to correct. Best regards, —Jim DeLaHunt, software engineer, Vancouver, Canada On 2020-05-20 02:08, Don Hollander wrote:
Anyone know anything about this? Apparently it’s not fit for purpose and should be either fixed or withdrawn.
John: How’s the universal regex going in the IETF?
Hope everyone out there is OK. Here in New Zealand we are emerging from our bubbles. So far, so good.
Don
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- --Jim DeLaHunt, jdlh@jdlh.com http://blog.jdlh.com/ (http://jdlh.com/) multilingual websites consultant 355-1027 Davie St, Vancouver BC V6E 4L2, Canada Canada mobile +1-604-376-8953