Hello Sarmad Appreciations for partaking the proceedings and modernized charter, nonetheless I am astonished that feedbacks specified in charter by me and other community members are not given any contemplation and they are not the part of the collectively revised charter document. Could we know its reason ? Kind wishes Richard Nims On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 11:20 PM Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org> wrote:
Dear UA-EAI WG members,
Please find attached the meeting notes from UA-EAI WG meeting on 20190730, for your information, review and any feedback.
Please also find attached the current version of the charter, incorporating the feedback so far and with some additional edits, for your further review.
*Action Items:*
No.
Action Item
Owner
1
Identify the earlier documentation from EAI WG on technical gaps and list of utilities and circulate to the WG
Sarmad Hussain
2
Review the charter document and send feedback on the whole document, especially the sections on purpose, outcome and membership
All members
Regards, Sarmad _______________________________________________ UA-EAI mailing list UA-EAI@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.