I've seen recent angst about DMARC on the IPv6 mailing list, but nothing against DKIM -----Original Message----- From: UA-EAI <ua-eai-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of John Levine Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 22:17 To: Evan Hanson <evanh@catalyst.net.nz> Cc: ua-eai@icann.org Subject: Re: [UA-EAI] EAI Evaluation - Phase 1 Hi again.
EAI-MTA-009, -010, -011 If this means you expect MSAs to re-code addresses or headers on the fly, they should not unless you can verify that they didn't break DKIM signatures when doing so.
Too true, I've added a note that DKIM should not be used for these test cases if the software applies recoding.
These days, if your MSA can't send mail with DKIM signatures, you're not going to get mail delivered. Perhaps split the test so that either the MSA passes through incoming signatures, or it applies them after any transformations. Regards, John Levine, john.levine@standcore.com Standcore LLC _______________________________________________ UA-EAI mailing list UA-EAI@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ua-eai