Hi, This is precisely why ChaptGTP is banned on Stack Overflow. The ban announcement says “its answers are frequently bad but look plausible” or words to that effect. Arnt From: UA-EAI <ua-eai-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Asmus Freytag via UA-EAI <ua-eai@icann.org> Reply to: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com> Date: Thursday, 2 February 2023 at 02:05 To: "ua-eai@icann.org" <ua-eai@icann.org> Subject: Re: [UA-EAI] Stackoverflow and ChatGPT Marc, you've identified two of the main problems with AI based answers. One, the impossibility to fix misperceptions embedded in the training data. The other, the difficulty for a human user to "rate" the level of expertise behind an AI generated answer. You can't use plausibility, because all AI generated answers are plausible. You can't use other "tells" of inexperience, because the AI generated texts don't have them. And you can't "rate" the AI like you can human experts; nor can you rate the true experts that it plagiarizes. If, as can be expected, significant levels of AI generated output are then being published on various sites in ways that even an AI can't be sure it's AI generated, then you not only get garbage in, garbage out, but fully recycled garbage. Misinformation of the human generated kind is harmless by comparison. A./