Jan. 7, 2012
5:35 p.m.
At 15:56 07/01/2012, SM wrote:
DNAME might be read as the off-the-self "solution" to technical problems.
Your analysis is of real interest. 1. it seems the debate will continue on this list. In such a case, please ICANN indicate the texte of reference for this debate, including all the annexes and provide a reformatable source (word or txt). 2. what do you mean by "off-the-self", is it a typo, an humoristic way to tell ICANN that DNAME are actually unworkable except in ICANN documents, or a call for an additional pre-request (P-DNS) service to support polynymy and orthotypography (and possibly anti-homography protection) that ICANN could couple to the IDNS solution? Best jfc