At 20:05 02/11/2014, Marc Blanchet wrote:
agree on many comments.
Am I right thinking that this blog post was done « fast » to be live during the discussions of PP, in order to tell the ITU « this problem is well underway and you donât need to be involved » ? Iâm saying that because maybe it is better to not be withdrawn, but instead just fixed, so that the underlying message is kept?
Dear Marc, I understand your point. However, any way you do it, the message has been sent, understood, and already been noticed. ICANN is not a reliable focal point for information about IDNs. Trying to correct it too visibly would only underline and confirm the point. IMHO the new message should be two folded in order to be true, credible and positively accepted: 1. that the IETF Internet IDN technology is sound, reliable and being used. 2. However, the IDNs use and governance call for a multistakeholder tuning and information among the international naming, internet users, ccTLD, ITU, Libre, and ICANN communities, wth the IETF technical assistance and IAB guidance. jfc