Dear Pam, * The Final report was submitted to the Chartering Organizations in July 2013 to seek their feed-back ( ALAC, ASO, ccNSO, GAC, and GNSO), as indicated in the Final Report. In November 2013, the request for written feed-back was re-iterated. By early 2014 the WG had received feed-back from ALAC, ccNSO and GNSO and, the then Chair of the WG retired. * With the new, recently appointed (April 2015) Chair, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, the WG is now in a position to finalise its activities, and prepare for submission of its Final Report to the Board. * Once the Final Report submitted to the Board, it is expected that a public forum will be launched to inform the Board's decision. I hope this helps. Kind regards Alice From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 4:44 PM To: Pam Little <pam.little@zodiac-corp.com<mailto:pam.little@zodiac-corp.com>> Cc: "wp3@icann.org<mailto:wp3@icann.org>" <wp3@icann.org<mailto:wp3@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Wp3] Final Report by ICANN Geographic Regions Review Working Group Dear Pam, Thank you for your questions. I have contacted staff supporting this effort and will get back to you and the WP3 on this as soon as possible. Best regards Alice From: Pam Little <pam.little@zodiac-corp.com<mailto:pam.little@zodiac-corp.com>> Date: Wednesday, July 8, 2015 12:01 PM To: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Cc: "wp3@icann.org<mailto:wp3@icann.org>" <wp3@icann.org<mailto:wp3@icann.org>> Subject: RE: [Wp3] Final Report by ICANN Geographic Regions Review Working Group Hi Alice, I have a couple of questions regarding this report. 1. The report is dated June 2013 and it refers to the ICANN Durban meeting. Could you clarify what has been done since Durban? 2. Your note mentioned: "It is intended that the report will be submitted to the Board prior to the Dublin meeting." Could you clarify if the following steps stated at para #87 on page 24 of the report have been completed. If not, what are the time lines for those: "Before these recommendations can be formally transmitted to the ICANN Board, the next step in this process consists of a final community review of the Final Report document and its recommendations by ICANN's various SO-AC structures. Footnote 15 above outlines the specific process steps for this review and consideration of the Working Group recommendations. The Working Group has determined that community review should extend for a full 90 calendar days after the conclusion of the ICANN Public Meeting in Durban." Thank you. Pam Little From:wp3-bounces@icann.org<mailto:wp3-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:wp3-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2015 7:05 PM To: wp3@icann.org<mailto:wp3@icann.org> Subject: [Wp3] Final Report by ICANN Geographic Regions Review Working Group Dear all, Further to the request made on call #1, please find below the link to the Final Report prepared by ICANN Geographic Regions Review Working Group for consideration by the ICANN Board (June 2013): https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/geo-regions-final-report-22jun13... It is intended that the report will be submitted to the Board prior to the Dublin meeting. Please note that this document has been added to your WP3 reading list - https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Reading+List May I also take this opportunity to inform you that three dedicated wiki pages have been created for all three subgroups. These pages will be the repositories for volunteers, documents and reading lists. * Diversity - https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Diversity * SO/AC accountability - https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53783727 * Staff accountability - https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Staff+accountability Kind regards Alice