Seun, Because the WPs are not decision making bodies. Greg On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Based on the outcome of the poll, I wonder why option 2 through to 4 will be applicable anymore. I quote below just incase:
"....In brief, the WP has expressed in a vast majority that No reference to a specific document should be included in the suggested bylaw text."
Regards
Sent from my Asus Zenfone2 Kindly excuse brevity and typos. On 12 Oct 2015 20:24, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel@channelisles.net> wrote:
I like this approach.
The wording can be made more concise and less ambgiuous as follows.
Here are the four alternatices.
1. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect internationally recognized human rights.
2. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
3. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Cultural and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
4. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Cultural and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and will carry out its work guided by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. _______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4