I hesitate to call it a "final edit" but I can propose some edits this afternoon, after lunch (NY time), and others can see how that looks. Greg On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina@mpicc.de> wrote:
+1 to Greg
By the way, the deadline is today, right? I can't edit the document because I am on holiday; have very limited time & access to Internet. Is there anyone who is going to make final edits?
best, Tatiana
On 12/10/15 16:57, Greg Shatan wrote:
I think that there has been broad opposition to "cherry-picking" human rights. I would apply this to the Ruggie principles as well.
Greg
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse < <el@lisse.na> el@lisse.na> wrote:
Nigel overlooked the reference to my profession, when we say "Look at" it usually involves scalpels :-)-O
So, how do the Ruggie principles look like without the subset?
el
On 2015-10-12 13:37, Nigel Roberts wrote:
Eberhard is misdirecting himself. We don't want to look at THAT subset.
We should be looking at (in set theoretical terms) the relative complement subset.
N.
On 12/10/15 12:27, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Paul,
I was not going to die in a ditch about the Ruggie principles, but why don't we look at your subset?
el
On 2015-10-11 23:03, Paul Twomey wrote:
Nigel
I am of a similar view as Tatiana's below.
My stated concern has always been with some subset sections of the Ruggie principles. Not necessarily with UDHR.
Paul [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ _______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing listWp4@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4