I do not support the idea of a call. I think that, to be formal, we must create two alternatives, both of which are "minimal". One which refers to the UDHR and one which does not. These two alternatives must be then placed before Members of the CCWG (i.e. not us participants) as the people chartered in this regard. I personally support the UDHR verson, particularly after talking with Markus Kummer recently. Mr reasons are as follows: 1. It's the 'minimal' HR text that is support globally. While I like the business principles, I think it's a step to far at this stage. 2. Leaving out a reference to any document exposes ICANN to the possibility that ANY human rights instrument or idea could be forced on is, such as the right to drinking water. On 11/10/15 15:52, Avri Doria wrote:
a. do we send just the agreed upon minimal bylaws text? b. or do we also send all the bracketed text?
While I have been somewhat ambivalent on this issue, I think there is more support in both the WP and the larger group for minimal text in the bylaw. I would support option a.
avri
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4