I think that there has been broad opposition to "cherry-picking" human rights. I would apply this to the Ruggie principles as well. Greg On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:
Nigel overlooked the reference to my profession, when we say "Look at" it usually involves scalpels :-)-O
So, how do the Ruggie principles look like without the subset?
el
On 2015-10-12 13:37, Nigel Roberts wrote:
Eberhard is misdirecting himself. We don't want to look at THAT subset.
We should be looking at (in set theoretical terms) the relative complement subset.
N.
On 12/10/15 12:27, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
Paul,
I was not going to die in a ditch about the Ruggie principles, but why don't we look at your subset?
el
On 2015-10-11 23:03, Paul Twomey wrote:
Nigel
I am of a similar view as Tatiana's below.
My stated concern has always been with some subset sections of the Ruggie principles. Not necessarily with UDHR.
Paul [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ _______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4