I agree that is that it should be clear - that is why I think the working through of the policies and bylaws envisaged in the draft language now will be important, but will probably take some time to avoid any unintended consequences. There are two questions: what range or existing statement of human rights should be adopted and then to which parts of ICANN's operations etc do they apply. On 9/3/15 1:21 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
I think I also said earlier that I totally agree that ICANN's obligations in this regard be limited to what it does within its mission.
So we are on the same page there.
I do however insist on knowing WHICH fundamental rights ICANN are signed up to respect.
Hence my suggestion that we be clear that human rights be limited only to ICANN's own ways of conducting its work within its mission.
_______________________________________________ Wp4 mailing list Wp4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
-- Dr Paul Twomey Managing Director Argo P@cific US Cell: +1 310 279 2366 Aust M: +61 416 238 501 www.argopacific.com