Nigel, nice pickup of the Newspeak watering it down to next to nothing. el On 2015-10-13 08:48, Nigel Roberts wrote:
I object to the inclusion of "will be committed to" as it waters down human rights.
"will respect" please.
On 12/10/15 23:10, Matthew Shears wrote:
So if one were to draw an "option" for the CCWG to consider from the WP poll (Q1 where there was greatest Delta between yes and no) it would be a reference to human rights in the bylaws without any reference to a particular document.
That seems to correlate largely with option 2 in the proposal which also had the greatest support:
/Within its mission and in it operations, ICANN will be committed to respect internationally recognized fundamental human rights./
If so does that suggest that one could consider the WP poll an indicator of additional support for that option? (Although the words "internationally" and "fundamental" still cause me indigestion.)
Matthew [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/