Hello all, The notes, recordings and transcripts for CCWG Accountability WS2 Reviewing the CEP, Meeting #1 - 26 October 2016 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/JRq4Aw A copy of the notes may be found below. Thank you. Kindest Regards, Yvette Guigneaux Multi-Stakeholder & Strategic Initiative Assistant ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers 12025 Waterfront Drive, Playa Vista, CA 90094 yvette.guigneaux@icann.org<mailto:yvette.guigneaux@icann.org> | www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> ________________________________ Notes Reviewing the CEP Subgroup Meeting #1 | on Wednesday, 26 October @ 13:00 UTC Notes(including relevant parts of chat): 6 Participants at start of call ________________________________ I. Introduction, Attendance, Regrets and Statements of Interest Ed Morris: Present agenda II. CEP: The Basics Ed Morris: (presentation of slides) III. Discuss: Areas and Topics of Interest avri doria: I am on the IOT and do not remember any discussion of CEP, but i may have missed it. will check our doc. Samantha Eisner: @Avri, I agree we did not discuss CEP on the IOT Farzaneh Badii: question regarding confidentiality. Ed Morris: for us to determine do we want disclosure? Should 3rd parties have access to some information? Farzaneh Badii: Issue parties present all information during mediation - confidentiality would seem sensible. Ed Morris: we will have to consider this in our work. Farzaneh Badii: CEP can also prolong the process . it has to be time limited Sm Eisner: Important to look at the purpose - its about finding out is is there an issue worthy of the IRP. Farzaneh Badii: agree with SE but the more we talk about it I feel like it is a private negotiation which I do not support especially if the issue is an issue that could affect the entire community - but I may of misunderstood. Ed Morris: Support that view - part of the confidentiality/transparency issue. Sam Eisner: EM and FB have touched on an important point of PRIVATE negotiation vs clarification of issues - it is supposed to be about clarification. Ed Morris: At the outset we may need to clearly set out the objectives of the CEP. IV. Proposed division of tasks / work plan Ed Morris: use the list to do most of the work. Farzaneh Badii: Yes. on the list makes more sense. My bandwidth is full Farzaneh Badii: can't do more meetings. unless I have them during lunch breaks! Farzaneh Badii: I'll help but I have too many pens in my hand can't have another one Samantha Eisner: I will send a redline of this section of the Bylaws for the group's convenience Farzaneh Badii: thanks Sam Ana Loup do not have a legal background - so can I work on this. Ed Morris: I can help you with the legal issues but another POV could be great. Farzaneh Badii: Yes . I can help too . we just need someone to hold the pen Samantha Eisner: Potential additional point from IOT - looking at experiences of people who did it. We could possibly do the same here? Ed Morris: great idea - how was it done in IOT? Sam Eisner: tried to bring people in group - Jones Day recommended some practitioners that were involved. ICANN has listed for the last year all ongoing CEPs - so I could get a compilation of the parties involved as a starting point. Ed Morris: Great idea? No objections. I will liaise with IRP IOT. AL will look at the Bylaws, FB will look at the procedural. SE will get us the list. Adjourned. Action Items: Samantha Eisner to distribute to the group a redline of the relevant sections of the Bylaws as well as a list of parties involved in CEPs. Ed Morris to liaise with Becky Burr and David McAuley in Hyderabad wrt links between CEP sub-group and IRP-IOT.