Dear Pam During discussions in previous calls, participants asked for a more streamlined questionnaire (short), so some questions were selected for deletion, including this one about rotating meeting times. The majority of the volunteers in the drafting team agreed. Best, Renata On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:19 AM, Pam Little <pam.little@zodiac-corp.com> wrote:
I agree with Mathieu on this one.
I think we are too late in the game for “open or value questions”. That’s why I suggested a more practical question earlier - “whether they rotate meeting times” but somehow the question seems to have been deleted.
Kind regards,
Pam
From: ws2-diversity-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-diversity-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 7:11 PM To: Mathieu Weill Cc: ws2-diversity@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-diversity] diversity questionnaire - observations from 31jan mtg
Dear Mathieu,
thanks for the comment,
I think that in the questionnaire we tried to be too prescriptive and give some freedom for the SO/AC to respond as much possible (in the same fashion that we tried to reduce the number of questions). if they have legal constraints such requirements in their charter or bylaws, I would expect that they will state that in their response.
The first question will give them the opportunity to indicate what elements of diversity we listed they take in consideration and maybe indicate the priority. The second question allows them to add any element we may have missed but important to them. The third question covers how the SO/AC track diversity and measure it, indicating which mechanisms they are applying if any.
I guess having diverse interpretations can help us in some way to understand how the different groups within ICANN perceive diversity and respond to it.
Best,
Rafik
2017-02-02 16:56 GMT+09:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr>:
Dear Colleagues,
I think the questionnaire is taking good shape. Maybe my comment is redundant, but I wonder whether the notions of "relevance" or "importance" of diversity dimensions will be clear for our questionnaire's target group.
Both notions can lead to very "diverse" interpretations, and I wonder whether we should be more precise ? Are we asking them if they have legal constraints, set targets for their groups, are tracking diversity levels ?
Best Mathieu
-----Message d'origine----- De : ws2-diversity-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-diversity-bounces@icann.org] De la part de Renata Aquino Ribeiro Envoyé : jeudi 2 février 2017 02:57 À : ws2-diversity@icann.org Objet : [Ws2-diversity] diversity questionnaire - observations from 31jan mtg
Hi all
Pls. find the latest version of diversity questionnaire according to observations from 31st jan meeting.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13UBH5JXmOvxA6H6Kg6W6o0GNDjfYRs3FwQULKS cgSmw/edit
Best,
Renata _______________________________________________ Ws2-diversity mailing list Ws2-diversity@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity _______________________________________________ Ws2-diversity mailing list Ws2-diversity@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity
_______________________________________________ Ws2-diversity mailing list Ws2-diversity@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-diversity