Anne, The Human Rights subgroup can consider your proposal as part of its work and how it fits into the CCWG-Accountability WS2 remit, I have included the various ways you can contribute to the work of the work below. The mailing list for the Human Rights subgroup is ws2-hr@icann.org The wiki page for the Human Rights subgroup is located at: https://community.icann.org/x/ihWOAw Karen Mulberry Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives ICANN From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 5:49 PM To: Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry@icann.org>, CCWG accountability <accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Cc: ACCT-Staff <acct-staff@icann.org>, "'lists@nielstenoever.net'" <lists@nielstenoever.net>, "Paul McGrady (Policy) (policy@paulmcgrady.com)" <policy@paulmcgrady.com> Subject: RE: CCWG WS2 Next Steps - Human Rights With respect to the Human Rights subgroup in Workstream 2, I would like to ask that the UN Declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples be included in this inquiry as we seek to develop a framework of interpretation. The CCWP on Human Rights (led by Niels) has already agreed to include the Rights of Authors (UN Universal Declaration Article 27) in its bullet points for discussion with respect to Subsequent Procedures. ICANN also needs to be looking at the Human Rights of indigenous Peoples in this context and in the context of development of the framework. BY WAY OF DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTS, I represent the Pascua Yaqui Tribe in Tucson Arizona. (I do not, however, have instructions from them with respect to participation in this Workstream 2 group.) Provisions which I think are relevant to the framework of interpretation on Human Rights are pasted below. The link to the Declaration is here: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf Article 11 1. Indigenous peoples have the right to practise and revitalize their cultural traditions and customs. This includes the right to maintain, protect and develop the past, present and future manifestations of their cultures, such as archaeological and historical sites, artefacts, designs, ceremonies, technologies and visual and performing arts and literature. 2. States shall provide redress through effective mechanisms, which may include restitution, developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples, with respect to their cultural, intellectual, religious and spir - itual property taken without their free, prior and informed consent or in violation of their laws, traditions and customs. Article 12 1. Indigenous peoples have the right to manifest, practise, develop and teach their spiritual and religious traditions, customs and cer - emonies; the right to maintain, protect, and have access in privacy to their religious and cultural sites; the right to the use and control of their ceremonial objects; and the right to the repatriation of their human remains. 2. States shall seek to enable the access and/or repatriation of cer - emonial objects and human remains in their possession through fair, transparent and effective mechanisms developed in conjunction with indigenous peoples concerned. 7 Article 13 1. Indigenous peoples have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral tradi- tions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures, and to designate and retain their own names for communities, places and persons. Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com <mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com <http://lrrc.com/> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Karen Mulberry Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 1:44 PM To: CCWG accountability Cc: ACCT-Staff Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG WS2 Next Steps Sent on behalf of the CCWG-Acct Co-Chairs CCWG WS2 Next Steps Now that we have outlined the WS2 workplan as part of the discussion in Helsinki, there are various areas where additional follow up will be needed as the subgroups get underway. Please note that the Subgroup sign up Google Doc will be closed as of 12 July 2016, to sign up as either an active participant or an observer in any of the Subgroups going forward please send your request to ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org). WS2 SUBGROUPS The following timeline was presented in Helsinki with the work divided into two approaches. Simple topics are anticipated to be short term and should be able to reach consensus quickly with a Public Comment period planned for October 2016 and the final output to be presented at the ICANN meeting in Copenhagen. The more complex topics will take longer to develop and as such will provide an update on the progress of the subgroup¹s work in Copenhagen, with the final report expected to be delivered in June 2017. An early indication from the Subgroup Rapporteurs as to whether their topic is on the simple timeline or the complex timeline would be useful so that the CCWG can plan its work to enable full participation in the subgroups of interest for each participant. Helsinki Timeline - Simple Topics Short Term June 2016: sub-groups agreed, commence work on docs for public input Aug 2016: first discussion with CCWG Sep 2016: refining work Oct 2016: CCWG agrees for public input 20 Oct-30 Nov: Public Input comment period Dec 2016: Analyze public comment staff/subgroups Jan 2017: Sub-groups refines and revises output Feb 2017: CCWG agrees final Output for consideration by community FOR ADOPTION at Copenhagen Helsinki Timeline - Complex Topics Intermediate/Long Term Jun 2016: sub-groups agreed Sep-Oct 2016: first discussion with CCWG - identifies whether and how to update community at Hyderabad Nov-Dec 2016: second discussion with CCWG (first SUBSTANTIVE) Jan 2017: refining work Feb 2017: CCWG agrees docs for public input 1 Mar to 10 Apr: Public Input comment period Apr 2017: Analyze public comment staff/subgroups May 2017: Sub-groups refines and revises output May/Jun 2017: CCWG agrees final Output for consideration by community SUBTEAM LEADERSHIP The following have indicated that they wish to be rapporteurs for WS2 topics. Diversity - Fiona Asonga, Rafik Dammak Human Rights - Niels ten Oever, Nigel Roberts, Paul McGrady Jurisdiction - Greg Shatan, Vinay Kesari Ombudsman - Sebastien Bacholet SO/AC Acct - Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Farzaneh Badii, Steve DelBianco Staff Acct. - Avri Doria Transparency - Michael Karanicolas Reviewing CEP - Ed Morris Guidelines for standards of conduct presumed to be in good faith associated with exercising removal of individual ICANN Board Directors - Lori Schulman Designated rapporteurs will need to reaffirm their time commitment, including the meeting time to work with the CCWG leadership team in preparatory and post drafting of their recommendations and reports. SUBGROUP DELIVERABLES Each subgroup is expected to deliver a report of its findings and recommendations to the CCWG Plenary for discussion and consensus. Periodic updates on the work of each subgroup will need to be provided by the Rapporteurs during CCWG Plenary sessions to track progress. The expectation is that the output reports and recommendations will look like an Annex of the Work Stream 1 report. The structure is an executive summary; a description of the issue, including the description of the current state of play and incorporation of the discussions and inputs received from the Work Stream 1 effort, the supplemental report; and a section describing the requirements for the recommendation and how the recommendation has been validated against WS1 recommendations. The report and recommendation will also need to include text to demonstrate how the subgroups recommendations are meeting what was previously known as the NTIA requirements. Each subgroup needs to be careful to demonstrate that they are conducting the due diligence needed in meeting the NTIA criteria with each and every one of its recommendations and requirements. These requirements will then be translated into specific Bylaw articles after CCWG plenary discussion and consensus and a Public Comment period has been held on the CCWG recommendations. SUBGROUP SCHEDULING Staff can support up to nine (9), one hour meeting slots per week, which will be available for the WS2 subgroup Rapporteurs to work together to select their group¹s meeting dates and times. The weekly 1-hour available slots for July and August will be as follows: three (3) slots at 05:00 UTC, three (3) slots at 13:00 UTC three (3) slots at 20:00 UTC The timing of the available slots will be reconsidered at the end of August so adjustments can be made, if necessary. However the nine (9) weekly one (1) hour slots will remain consistent in order for ICANN staff to support the work of all the subgroups with no more than three (3) slots to occur on any one day of the week. Karen Mulberry Director Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives ICANN This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
