Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Aug 2017, at 22:44, <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
Dear Niels, what is "unanimous" consent? How many participants attended the call and how many expressed such explicit support? Or do you mean absence of objections? Of how many people on the call? thanks Jorge
________________________________
Von: Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> Datum: 22. August 2017 um 22:01:09 MESZ An: ws2-hr@icann.org <ws2-hr@icann.org> Betreff: [Ws2-hr] Outcomes of todays call
Human Rights sub-group participants,
On today’s Human Rights call we completed the first reading of our report back to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2 plenary with unanimous consent (documents attached).
The sub-group does recognize that some participants who disagree with portions of the report were unable to attend the call and therefore as per the CCWG WS2 Charter Section V this would only constitute a consensus decision.
It was also agreed that those participants wishing to include a minority opinion statement in the final report should be allowed to do so.
As such any such minority opinion statements by participants should be available to the sub-group by Monday 28 August 23:59 UTC so they can be considered as part of the second reading on Tuesday 29 August 19:00 UTC.
Best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr