Dear all, Thank you very much for your inputs. Based on your comments I made a new version of tonights agenda and amended the slides in line with that as well. Please find them underneath and attached. 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Discussion on Working Methods 3. Analysis and discussion of proposed definition of applicable law 4. Analysis and discussion on the progress of the drafting team working on the new proposal for FoI 5. AOB Best, Niels On 10/11/2016 03:27 PM, McAuley, David wrote:
Hi Niels, Nigel:
I would like to note a particular request to our intrepid drafting team of Tatiana, Matthew, Jorge, and Greg for today’s call, if possible.
It would be interesting to hear their perspectives on the utility of using Google docs at this stage. I have to admit I am struggling with it – and I have just been a reader of this document so far, not a contributor.
It seems to me a very useful tool when the number of commenters and comments is manageable but loses its usefulness as those grow.
I also admit a preference, probably developed in WS1, for the development of issues on list prior to putting pen to paper for a rough or final draft.
The problem might simply be uniquely mine and I will have to deal with it. But as our drafters worked up page after page I wonder if they developed views on this tool at this stage of our work.
Thank you
David
David McAuley
International Policy Manager
Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154
*From:*ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Dr. Tatiana Tropina *Sent:* Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:32 AM *To:* ws2-hr@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda + documents meeting October 11 - 19:00 UTC
Hi Niels,
since the new FoI document proposal is still work in progress, can we perhaps rephrase the agenda item 3 to reflect this? Right now the agenda item sounds like the small team produced the new document, but in fact we are still discussing and drafting - and our points of disagreement actually reflect the general disagreements of the group as a whole. Shall we rather say "3. Analysis and discussion on the progress of the drafting team working on the new proposal for FoI" or something like this?
Cheers
Tanya
On 11/10/16 11:00, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you well. Please find underneath the proposed
agenda for the call of our subgroup on 11 October 19:00 UTC.
Please find also attached the proposed slides as well as the document
the Drafting Team consisting of Greg, Tatiana, Matt and Jorge, have been
working on this week. You can also find that document here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XFmkzSFh4CuVR7uWWh6-ZUNii4iVd-jQwx9eZ01C...
All your comments and suggestions are of course very welcome.
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Analysis and discussion of proposed definition of applicable law by
David McAuley
3. Analysis and discussion on new draft FoI document produced by
Drafting Team
4. AOB
I'm greatly looking forward to see you all on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9