Hi Niels, since the new FoI document proposal is still work in progress, can we perhaps rephrase the agenda item 3 to reflect this? Right now the agenda item sounds like the small team produced the new document, but in fact we are still discussing and drafting - and our points of disagreement actually reflect the general disagreements of the group as a whole. Shall we rather say "3. Analysis and discussion on the progress of the drafting team working on the new proposal for FoI" or something like this? Cheers Tanya On 11/10/16 11:00, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you well. Please find underneath the proposed agenda for the call of our subgroup on 11 October 19:00 UTC.
Please find also attached the proposed slides as well as the document the Drafting Team consisting of Greg, Tatiana, Matt and Jorge, have been working on this week. You can also find that document here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XFmkzSFh4CuVR7uWWh6-ZUNii4iVd-jQwx9eZ01C...
All your comments and suggestions are of course very welcome.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Analysis and discussion of proposed definition of applicable law by David McAuley 3. Analysis and discussion on new draft FoI document produced by Drafting Team 4. AOB
I'm greatly looking forward to see you all on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr